#QUICKSYNC SUPPORTED CPUS HOW TO#
#QUICKSYNC SUPPORTED CPUS 1080P#
#QUICKSYNC SUPPORTED CPUS FULL#

On top of that, Quick Sync can handle in excess of 20 1080p streams and about 5 4k transcodes in my testing. Quick Sync is capable of a 4k transcode at 35w! This is a 10x reduction from the Dual Xeon setup I'd been using previously. This was a legitmate 'holy shit!' moment for me.

#QUICKSYNC SUPPORTED CPUS FULL#

Full details in episode 34 of Self-Hosted (releases on Friday 18th Dec 2020). If you needed even more convincing, take a look at the following numbers and see just how incredibly power efficient Quick Sync is compared to software based transcoding with Plex. If you're not convinced yet, take a look this video from Wendell who explains in a lot of detail why this technology is so cool! Intels rumoured upcoming XE graphics card might support it but until then, we'll have to make do with the iGPU in your CPU. In our case, we'll use the Quick Sync portion of the iGPU to transcode Plex H264 streams in one VM and Blue Iris streams in another. That is precisely what GVT-g permits us to do! Take the iGPU and give a VM, or multiple VMs, a slice of that graphics chip to do with whatever it wants. Wouldn't it be nice if we could slice up 1 GPU and use it with multiple VMs at once? Passing through an entire GPU is very useful for specific tasks but isn't a very efficient use of resources. Also see this blog post which was helpful in my research for this topic.

#QUICKSYNC SUPPORTED CPUS HOW TO#

It's actually very easy with Proxmox, here's how to do it. What if you want to run Plex in a VM and take advantage of hardware accelerated decoding? Specifically to use the Intel Quick Sync functionality built-in to most modern Intel CPU graphics units. Who would prefer to stick with Intel for one reason or another.Since publication I have abandoned this method. It has some potential to overclock higher, it may be of interest to some users AMD equation into IntelвЂ™s favor or at least achieve some kind of parity between them.Д¬offee Lake (Skylake refresh) as the standard Core i9 9900KF. In some cases, the difference can be as much as $50, which can bring the вЂњKFвЂќ CPU into a better price/performance ratio which can potentially change the Intel vs. While this varies somewhat, typically IвЂ™ve found вЂњKFвЂќ series CPUвЂ™s cheaper than their iGPU enabled counterparts. If your gaming or using specific applications, this is a huge potential win. The iGPU generates heat and as we saw with the otherwise useless Core i7 7740X, the lack of an integrated GPU can theoretically mean higher clock speeds. In fact, on your motherboard, one or more phases of the motherboardвЂ™s power are devoted to this in most cases. It does use some power by simply being in the CPU die and being enabled. As it turns out, there are some upsides to ditching the iGPU. Lastly, it can be used to connect additional displays to the system or potentially use the onboard video instead of a discrete GPU for power savings.ДЄlthough, in a pure gaming build, QuickSync may not make a difference to you. Also, the iGPU is capable of a feature called вЂњIntel QuickSync.вЂќ This is a feature that can be used to transcode video very quickly.

A feature that was made available starting with the introduction of IntelвЂ™s Z68 Express chipset a very long time ago was one where you could theoretically use the onboard GPU when not gaming and save power. Or is it? Well, it turns out that the iGPU does have some benefits in specific scenarios. Therefore, the loss of the iGPU isnвЂ™t really a loss at all.

Quicksync supported cpus